The short version.
I'm the founder + sole engineer of BizBot Technology LLC. I shipped 15 vertical AI products — SiteLine, AgentEdge, CaseFile, VitalCoach, BrightChair, DealDesk, GearShift, Keyring, Playbook, Radiance, WattWorks, YesChef, Horizon Talent, CutRoom, TierUp — over the last 8 months. They run on the shared customer brain (Orbit) you've been reading about. I read every email to hello@bizbottech.com personally, and reply within one business day, almost always faster.
Why one person, on purpose.
The conventional wisdom is: hire fast, raise money, scale the team. I didn't, for two reasons.
First, the architecture wasn't worth scaling until it worked. Hiring a sales team to sell a product you're not sure converts is how you waste 2 years of investor money. I wanted to ship 15 verticals on shared infrastructure to test whether the "one brain architecture, many vertical products" thesis held up before I asked anyone to sell it. It does — the marginal cost of vertical 15 is now ~2 weeks of engineer-time, and each tenant's brain runs identically with their data fully isolated. That's the architecture validation.
Second, the founder writing the code is unusually high-leverage right now. Anthropic's Claude has gotten dramatically better at coding in the last 12 months. A solo founder using Claude 4.7 ships in a week what a 5-person team shipped in a quarter two years ago. I'm not trying to romanticize the solo founder thing — I will hire when the workload genuinely outpaces what one person can do. Today, it doesn't.
"Hire fast, raise money, scale the team" is a strategy. "Ship 14 things first to prove the architecture, then scale" is a different strategy. I picked the second one.
Why I believe the shared brain is the moat.
Before BizBot, I spent years watching small businesses (mostly trades + service) get stuck on the same problem: they had 4 different vendors handling 4 different customer touchpoints. The phone agent vendor didn't know about the SMS thread. The review-management vendor didn't know about the appointments. Every interaction started from scratch because each tool only saw its own slice.
The shift I bet on: AI got good enough to act on a customer record, not just display it. That meant the company that built one customer record + multiple AI modules that read and write to it would be structurally advantaged over the company that built one great voice agent with no record underneath. The moat thesis lays this out in 9 minutes — but the short version is: voice agents are commoditized and the connective tissue between modules isn't.
I built BizBot to test that. Now I'm watching it work.
What this means for prospects.
- Response time is unusually fast. Email me, you talk to the person who built the product. No sales handoff, no SDR, no "let me check with the team."
- Custom configuration is a real conversation. If your business needs the legal-vertical conflict-check questions tuned for your state bar, that's a 20-minute call and a same-day deploy. Not a Salesforce-style "we'll roadmap that for Q3."
- SOC 2 Type II is 12+ months away. If you can't deploy without it, I'll say that on the first call. Full security + compliance posture is here.
- The platform is sustainable on its current revenue. I'm not desperate to close you. If we're not the right fit, I'd rather say that than waste your evaluation time.
What this means for investors.
- The capital efficiency story is real. 15 vertical products + a public live event feed + 23 marketing pages + a working orchestrator, on a 1-person engineering team, in 8 months. The unit economics aren't theoretical.
- The architecture lock-in compounds with usage. Every customer added to the shared brain makes the next vertical's pitch easier. The 25th vertical sells itself in a way the 1st didn't.
- I'm not seeking exit before $5M ARR. Acquirer interest exists; the strategic risk register includes both inbound interest and a deliberate "not yet" posture. If the right partnership comes, the conversation is open. If the goal is "scale to $50M then exit," I'm aligned.
- The 1-person posture is the bet. If the bet is wrong — if BizBot needs a 20-person team to grow — that's solvable with capital. If the bet is right, the capital efficiency advantage is real.
How to actually reach me.
hello@bizbottech.com. That's the only address. I read every one personally. Subject lines I respond to fastest:
- "Pilot customer interest" — half-off for 12mo in exchange for permission to publish the case study. Format here.
- "Security review" — DPAs, security questionnaires, BAA requests. Reply within 1 business day with what I can answer + what's on the roadmap.
- "Investor intro" — happy to do a 30-min intro call if there's a clear thesis fit. I'll send the deck after the call, not before.
- "Press" — interview requests, podcast invites, comment-on-this-trend asks. Yes to most, no to "thought leadership ghost-write."
That's it. Nothing else important to say on this page that isn't already on /orbit/moat or /orbit/security.